The short answer is yes, Tekla is worth it - but only for a specific set of users. Tekla Structures is an elite, professional-grade software for structural engineering and detailing, offering unmatched precision for complex projects. Its significant investment returns value by reducing costly errors and streamlining fabrication workflows, but its premium price and steep learning curve make it overkill for smaller firms or general architectural work.
For large-scale engineering, detailing, and construction firms, Tekla's capabilities justify the high cost. For everyone else, more accessible alternatives likely offer better value. Here’s a breakdown of what you need to know.
How Is Tekla's Quality?
Tekla Structures is widely considered an A-grade software in the structural engineering industry due to its power, precision, and reliability. Here’s what defines its quality:
- Modeling & Precision: Tekla's core strength is its incredibly detailed and accurate modeling capability. It uses advanced algorithms for structural analysis, steel and concrete detailing, and fabrication, allowing users to create "constructible" models that translate directly into mistake-free shop drawings and on-site execution.
- Software Craftsmanship: While its user interface is complex and prioritizes function over form, the underlying software engineering is top-tier. Built on a stable and modular architecture, it consistently performs well even with massive, complex project files containing thousands of components. Regular updates and patches reflect a strong commitment to quality control.
- Reliability & Durability: In practical use, Tekla is extremely durable. AEC firms report minimal software crashes and efficient handling of large-scale models. The software’s longevity is excellent, with subscriptions providing continuous updates and support for long-term use across multi-year projects.
- Common Issues: Most reported performance issues, like slow rendering times, are tied to outdated hardware rather than the core software. Any failures tend to stem from compatibility problems with third-party plugins rather than deficiencies within Tekla itself.
Is Tekla Good Value for the Price?
Tekla’s value is exceptional for its target market, but its high cost makes it a strategic investment rather than a casual purchase. It provides immense ROI by preventing errors that can cost millions on a large project.
Price Positioning
Tekla Structures is a premium product with a price to match. Annual licenses typically cost between $15,000 to $25,000 per user, depending on the modules and configuration. This is significantly higher than competitors like Autodesk Revit, which usually runs closer to $2,500 annually. Tekla positions itself as a specialized, high-end tool where precision is non-negotiable.
What You're Paying For
The cost covers industry-leading accuracy in structural detailing, superior integration with fabrication machinery (CNC), and advanced tools for complex steel connections and rebar placement. You are paying to reduce on-site rework, improve coordination between engineering and fabrication, and manage complex builds with a high degree of confidence and fewer errors.
Where You Get Good Value
- Complex Industrial or Commercial Projects: For projects like stadiums, high-rises, or industrial plants where structural complexity is high, Tekla's precision is invaluable.
- Steel and Precast Concrete Fabricators: Firms that turn digital models into physical components get immense value from Tekla’s direct-to-machine data outputs and hyper-accurate shop drawings.
- Large AEC Firms: Companies where reducing a single major on-site error can save hundreds of thousands of dollars will see a quick return on their investment.
Where You Don't Get Good Value
- Small Firms or Freelancers: The steep price and learning curve make it a poor value proposition for small teams with limited budgets and project volume.
- Architecture-Focused Design: For firms primarily focused on architectural design and general BIM modeling, Tekla is overkill. Autodesk Revit offers better value for these tasks.
- Simple Structural Projects: If a project doesn't require intricate detailing or complex fabrication, the investment in Tekla won't pay off.
Tekla Quality by Application
Tekla is not a one-size-fits-all tool. Its value heavily depends on how you use it. Here’s a breakdown by primary application:
Structural Detailing (Steel & Concrete)
This is Tekla’s home turf. For creating detailed, fabrication-ready models of steel connections or complex concrete rebar, it is the undisputed industry leader. The level of detail you can model and directly convert into shop drawings and CNC data is unmatched, preventing costly downstream errors. Verdict: Absolutely worth it, this is its primary value.
General AEC BIM Modeling
While Tekla is a powerful BIM tool, its functionality is laser-focused on structural elements. For integrated architectural, MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing), and structural modeling under one roof, software like Autodesk Revit is often more efficient and cost-effective. Verdict: Overkill and less efficient than alternatives for general design.
Construction Management & Collaboration
Tekla offers excellent tools for clash detection, construction sequencing, and on-site coordination. By building a high-fidelity digital model first, teams can solve problems on the screen instead of in the field, saving tremendous amounts of time and money. Verdict: High value for large-scale projects looking to streamline construction workflows.
Our Verdict: Is Tekla Worth It?
Tekla is absolutely worth its premium price for structural engineering firms, fabricators, and large construction companies that require the highest level of detail and accuracy. It is a strategic tool designed to provide ROI by eliminating errors on complex projects. For smaller firms or broader architectural uses, it is not worth the investment.
Quality Grade: A-
Tekla earns an A- for its exceptional quality, producing highly precise and reliable structural models. Its software architecture is stable, its features are industry-leading, and it excels at its core competency. It loses a few points for its intimidatingly steep learning curve and performance that relies heavily on high-end hardware.
Value Grade: B+
For its target audience, Tekla offers fantastic value. The cost is high, but the potential ROI from a single mistake avoided on a multi-million dollar project is massive. However, its high barrier to entry - both in cost and training - prevents a top score, as its value is inaccessible to a large portion of the AEC industry.
Better Alternatives to Tekla
If Tekla's price or complexity is a concern, these excellent alternatives offer strong features for specific needs, often at a more accessible price point:
Autodesk Revit
Revit is the industry standard for general BIM, integrating architectural, MEP, and structural modeling in a single platform. It's more affordable (~$2,500/year) and has a more intuitive interface but lacks the granular fabrication-level detail that is Tekla's signature strength.
Shop now at autodesk.com
Autodesk Advance Steel
Built on the AutoCAD platform, Advance Steel is a specialized tool for 3D steel detailing and fabrication drawings. It offers a powerful feature set for steel detailers at a lower price than Tekla (~$5,000/year) and integrates well with the broader Autodesk ecosystem.
Shop now at autodesk.com
Bentley Systems STAAD
STAAD is a premier software for structural analysis and design rather than detailing. For engineers who need to perform complex analysis based on various international codes, STAAD is a powerful and respected alternative or a complementary tool to a modeling suite.
Shop now at bentley.com
Allplan Engineering
Popular in Europe, Allplan offers an integrated BIM solution for architects and structural engineers with strong capabilities in concrete modeling and rebar detailing. Its pricing (~$6,000 - $12,000) is competitive, offering a powerful, detail-oriented alternative to Tekla.
Shop now at allplan.com
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Tekla so expensive?
Tekla's price reflects its position as a highly specialized tool for a mission-critical industry. The cost covers extensive research and development for creating complex modeling algorithms, and for its target users, the price is justified by the ROI in preventing costly construction errors and streamlining fabrication.
Is Tekla better than Revit?
Neither is unilaterally "better" - they excel at different tasks. Tekla is superior for fabrication-level structural detailing, especially for steel and precast concrete. Revit is better for integrated, multi-disciplinary BIM where architects, structural engineers, and MEP engineers collaborate in a single model.
How long does it take to learn Tekla?
Tekla has a notoriously steep learning curve due to its complexity and depth. Basic proficiency can take several weeks of dedicated training, but becoming a true expert often takes many months or even years of consistent use on real-world projects.
At Interior Insider, we're dedicated to curating the best in home decor, interior design, and home essentials to help you discover brands we think you'll love. Every brand we feature is independently selected by our editorial team based on quality, design, and craftsmanship. When you make a purchase through our links, Interior Insider may earn a commission - which helps support our small team and allows us to continue bringing you inspiration and expert advice for creating your perfect space.
Looking for more inspiration? Explore our curated design guides to find your next favorite piece.
